Petrified footprints found
on a granite-rock cliff in Africa above left, and America on right. Are these giant human
footprints, as ordinarily supposed, or possible archaic Sasquatch/Bigfoot footprints instead? The
super-sized footprints are not those of primates, but of humans.
Is it possible that the ancient giants and Sasquatch/Bigfoot were actually one and the same? Certain
Native Americans claim to have lived next to tribes of Bigfoot. The ancient Achaean Greeks also claimed
to have lived next to tribes of annoying giants in the UK, the Basques claimed the exact same. Oddly,
both the Paiute Indians (Chinese) of North America, and the archaic Achaean Greeks of very ancient
UK claimed to have smothered the last of the giants in a cave by setting fires at the mouth of the caves.
Were ancient giants and Sasquatch just overly hairy? Actual close-up Sasquatch/Bigfoot witnesses
state Sasquatch are not furry, but very hairy. Both the O.T. and the Legend of Gilgamesh stated that
Esau, Jacob's older brother, and Enkidu, the forest giant (Anunaki-Anu/Ainu meant covered in hair;
aka meant female, naka meant male and groups; naki meant disgusting.) had extremely thick hair on
their bodies. The O.T. story stated Esau would forever live in the green places, whereas, Enkidu had
left his green forest and became the right-hand man and best Buddy of King Gilgamesh of Uruk, who was
even taller than Enkidu.
The photo below was caught on a trail-cam and might be the back of a Sasquatch?
|
Mystery Faces 
