Above photos shows a silvery UFO nestled in ground-covering plants, branches and mangrove-like
roots on a cliff-side embankment over-looking a creek, or once canal, and Martain Landscape or lake. A 'Look-out' or a
Also note the trail, or stream meandering down the hill on the top right-side. The entire area is a mat of ground
covering plants, long grappling branch and root systems with criss-crossing streams. Mars?? This is from NASA's Mars
Global Surveyor (MGS) M1800558.
See original image which is movable and expandable.
Below is a larger area coverage of the above photographed area of the silvery UFO, yellow arrow,
but now further in distance which shows the entire area to be lushly covered in thick, vine-like folage with streams and
water forking off below, with possible rivulets or trails above.
The below video shows foliage or trees in snow
at Mars' south pole. Trees can only survive in snow if dormant during freezing winters, and come out of dormancy in
spring and summer warm weather thaws. No trees grow in Earth's Antarctic snows, or grew in the Arctic when it was
frozen-over in earlier times.
So why do trees appear on Mars' poles? If these images are really of Mars, it shows that Mars is actually a 'warmish'
place, and has warm spring and summer thaws with verdure and trees, as well as cold winters. And from 'where' did the
trees and/or shrubs original seeds derive? The video's images are from Google Mars. But are they factual?
The Mars' Rovers' images? Have they ever really been on Mars -- or just hoaxes. Only independent Astronomers'
high-powered telescopes can clear-up real Martian 'fog'.
The video below shows a seemingly Martain mega city of buildings, and one wonders if
the images are just another ordinary NASA faux pas (Mr. fox paws mistepping his fox trot). Also, if Mars
was used only for a mining base after its' supposed destruction? Or, if it had always been used as a mining-base,
and just too much trouble to bother terraforming.
Or, perhaps no terraforming was ever needed - reptiles and succulents already in abundance there, plus all those
trees and water? And with all those plants there would be bees, bugs and birds as well. All their residues and
moistures would make good soil humus.
And how does Mars get all its' snow? If there is snow and trees, there must also be rain. If there is rain there
must also be clouds. Where there are clouds there is atmosphere. Where there is atmosphere, there is warmth, cold
and condensation, fog and breezes, as well as strong winds and storms -- including 'dust' storms.
Do we ever see clouds on Mars? Or are they possibly chalked-up as 'dust devils'? Images are from NASA's MOC:
Martian Miner's Smelter City?
Astronomers have known for centuries and multitudinous decades that Mars had
snow, water and wet seasons. After camera and film were invented, and in the early 1900s encyclopedias
and educational books for children printed photographs and gave details of the photos taken of Mars through
astronomers' high-powered telescopes of the seasonal changes of snow, water and glacial run-off.
Mars appears to be wet, humid, and damp in many places. So why the abject denials, and blind-fold by Space
Programs, academia, and so-called 'science' in recent years? Clearly Mars is a well-kept secret -- possibly mining
of expensive money-making ores and minerals can, and is being done; and may be one major reason why the diversional
cover-up, and why recent generations have been completely duped and blinded to the real nature of Mars.
More recently Space Programs have realized they can no longer continue the "no-water" on Mars hoax, so step by step
have started "discovering" ice, and alleged briny-water on Mars here and there that supposedly cannot freeze
because of its "salt" content -- another hoax? And that Mars is too 'cold' to support life; although they want us to
believe they are going to set-up bases and colonize it? More diversional hoaxes not accurately
reported or revealed; but used for funding never-ending, "research" programs?